One of the most powerful books I have read recently is Guy Sajer's The Forgotten Solider.First published in France in 1967, the The Forgotten Solider is a personal account of life as a ground soldier in the German army in Russian at the end of World War II. I found the book to be a moving description of what it feels to be an average man living through a time of extraordinary hardship and cruelty. The Forgotten Solider is considered something of a classic in military history and is used today in officer training. But the question lingers, is the book really true?
The Forgotten Solider is the story of Guy Sajer, a 16-year-old French boy with a German mother who lived in a part of France incorporated into Germany at the beginning of the war. The story begins in 1942 after Sajer has washed out of the Luftwaffe, and is marching off to train as solider. Because of his age he is assigned to a transportation and not a front line unit, but in the spring of 1943 Sajer volunteers to join the elite Gross Deutschland Division mostly because he gets a two week pass in exchange. Sajer tells us that he remained a part of the Gross Deutschland for the rest of the war as was called on to fill in the breach at Kursk, Kharkov, Kiev, Romania, East Prussia, and Memel. With pride, Sajer writes:
"We each received the famous insignia of the Gross Deutschland division, with its divisional title in silver Gothic letters on a black background. The band remained on my sleeve until 1945 when the rumor ran though our scattered ranks that the Americans where shooting any man with a divisional name instead of a number. At that moment of hasty judgment they might very well have shot a nobody from the Gross Deutschland or the Brandenburg as easily as a hero from the Lebenstandarte or Totenkoph. "
After the war, his Allied captors were unsure if to classify him as a German or as a French collaborator. He was repatriated by joining the French Army and later marrying a French woman to became a graphics illustrator in Paris. One of his illustrations Hope Above the Lines appears in this posting.
The book gives readers a uncannily accurate sense of the emotional reaction of a common solider to battle. It is this emotion that makes The Forgotten Solider so compelling:
"Three Messerschmidts passed overhead, and were greeted with a loud cheer. The confidence the infantry placed in the Luftwaffe was absolute, and on innumerable occasions the familiar shape of the planes with the black crosses restored faltering courage and frustrated a Russian attack."
Sajer writes about the hardships and frustrations experienced by common soldiers and is not uncritical of the German Army. The bullying by NCO's, the hunger, the cold. He also doesn't make any great claims for his own ability as a soldier. This makes The Forgotten Solider a convincing account.
But there are some factual problems with the book, which were debated by Lieutenant Colonel Doug Nash and Lieutenant Colonel Edward L. Kennedy, Jr. in the pages of Army History the official publication of the U.S. Army's Center of Military History. Nash, a combat officer, thinks The Forgotten Solider. is true, while Kennedy, a military historian, thinks it is a novel.
Here is the central problem of all autobiographies - the balance of fact and truth. In our scientific times it seems illogical to separate one from the other, but could Nash and Kennedy both be right? Is it possible for The Forgotten Solider to be true but not factual at the same time?
From my perspective , the most convincing problems with The Forgotten Solider facts is that no record of either Sajer or his respected commander, Hauptmann Wesreidau can be found in the Gross Deutschland records that exist today. Granted these records are incomplete. Both Nash and Kennedy agree that there are many minor factual errors in book, most significantly where the Gross Deutschland uniform insignia was placed. Sajer describes being ordered to sew it on to his left sleeve, when the Gross Deutschland wore the insignia on their right sleeve. (Certain Waffen-SS divisions were also wore cuff titles, but on their left sleeve).
At first glace, this does not seem problem with Albrecht Speer's autobiography "Inside the Third Reich" which seems both factual and true. Speer's accomplishments as Minster of Armaments were well known. Meticulous minutes of his meetings were kept and later used against him during his trial as war criminal at Nuremberg. so his autobiography is very factual. Yet it does not escape the central dilemma of autobiography, or for that matter experience.
It is a fact that Hitler's bunker had an air vent, but is it true that Speer planed to assassinate him by pouring poison gas into the vent? Can anyone say, even Speer himself, with certainty?
In a letter to Nash, Sajer defends his book "I never had the intention to write a historical reference book; rather I wrote about my innermost emotional experiences as they relate to the events that happened to me in the context of the Second World War."
Sajer may have fought in Russia as part of the German army, but he may not have been a member of the Gross Deutschland. He may have instead have been with the Waffen SS, or been a part of something that he does not want to be called to account for today.
In its way, this is as strong a repudiation of Nazi Party and everything it stood for as Speer's assassination attempts. in it is the foundation of modern Germany.